Reduce waste and non-value-adding steps in productivity comparison models.
Designing Models to Compare Productivity Between Branches and Departments
A practical programme in productivity comparison models for professionals who are accountable for results, not just awareness.
📍 Abu Dhabi🗓️ 5 training days📚 4 modules🎓 Accredited certificate
5intensive training days
4scientific modules
8training sessions
32detailed points
Course Overview
Most defects in productivity comparison models are designed in long before they are detected. Improvement in this part of quality and productivity management that is not measured tends to be reversed quietly. It establishes a shared vocabulary for the wider quality and productivity management agenda so that teams can disagree productively about it. The version of productivity comparison models described in the manual and the version practised on the floor tend to diverge over time. The teaching approach is deliberately practical: participants build a control plan for the practice within quality and productivity management as they go. The material serves both public bodies and commercial organisations dealing with the wider quality and productivity management agenda. Field experience suggests that the barrier to better productivity comparison models is rarely technical. The programme builds the judgement to know which parts of the quality and productivity management capability to standardise and which to leave flexible. It ends with a prioritised list of changes to this strand of quality and productivity management that the participant is prepared to defend internally.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Identify the failure points in productivity comparison models most likely to cause loss, and control them first.
Design control plans for productivity comparison models that detect deviation early.
Plan the handover of productivity comparison models so that capability is not lost when key staff move on.
Recognise early indicators that productivity comparison models is drifting away from its intended design.
Calculate the cost of poor quality attributable to productivity comparison models.
Build capability in root cause analysis across the team handling productivity comparison models.
Who Should Attend
Health, safety and environmental staff whose systems integrate with productivity comparison models.
Analysts producing the data on which decisions about productivity comparison models rest.
Training officers building problem-solving capability in productivity comparison models.
Inspection and testing staff verifying productivity comparison models.
Production and operations supervisors delivering productivity comparison models.
Officers preparing reports on productivity comparison models for boards or oversight committees.
Course Modules
Productivity comparison models: control plans, sampling and acceptance
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1Who answers for productivity comparison models, and to whom
- Choose productivity measures for productivity comparison models that do not reward shortcuts.
- Name a single owner for each element of productivity comparison models.
- Set sampling for productivity comparison models on statistical grounds, not on habit.
- Set escalation thresholds for productivity comparison models that work out of hours.
Session 2Sustaining the gain on productivity comparison models after the project ends
- Arrange the handover of productivity comparison models so capability survives staff changes.
- Measure current variation in productivity comparison models before attempting improvement.
- Define supplier quality requirements affecting inputs to productivity comparison models.
- Identify the few causes responsible for most defects in productivity comparison models.
Productivity comparison models: structured problem solving and root cause
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1Finding the variation that matters in productivity comparison models
- Write standard work for productivity comparison models with the people who perform it.
- Confirm that those complying with productivity comparison models understand why it exists.
- Rehearse the briefing on productivity comparison models that would follow an incident.
- Set the review cadence that sustains gains in productivity comparison models.
Session 2Agreeing what good actually means for productivity comparison models
- Set the review interval for productivity comparison models and who attends.
- Confirm that contractual obligations around productivity comparison models are understood.
- Prepare the response for the most likely failure in productivity comparison models.
- Apply structured root cause analysis to the top defect in productivity comparison models.
Productivity comparison models: benchmarking and continual improvement
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1Standard work for productivity comparison models without deskilling it
- Record what was learned when productivity comparison models did not go as planned.
- Record what was tried on productivity comparison models and did not work, and why.
- Estimate the resource productivity comparison models requires to run as designed.
- Distinguish symptoms from causes when productivity comparison models underperforms.
Session 2Keeping productivity comparison models alive after the initial push
- Establish what evidence demonstrates productivity comparison models is under control.
- Map the handovers in productivity comparison models between functions and secure them.
- Verify that improvements to productivity comparison models held six months later.
- Build a control plan for productivity comparison models identifying what is checked, when and by whom.
Productivity comparison models: defining quality in measurable terms
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1What has to be agreed before work on productivity comparison models starts
- Assemble certification evidence for productivity comparison models as work proceeds, not before the audit.
- Define quality for productivity comparison models in terms the customer would recognise.
- Set out how exceptions to productivity comparison models are requested and approved.
- Decide what will be stopped to create capacity for productivity comparison models.
Session 2Auditing productivity comparison models to improve it, not to pass
- Design the internal audit schedule covering productivity comparison models.
- Identify non-value-adding steps in productivity comparison models and remove them.
- Benchmark productivity comparison models against a comparable operation and record the gap.
- Set out the decisions in productivity comparison models that require sign-off and by whom.
Choose the package that suits you
Silver Package
At least 3 people
USD1,250
- Workshop or Program Participation
- Airport Transfers
- Customized Badge
- Expert Mentorship (Private Sessions)
- Supervision & Secretarial Services
- Accredited Certificate of Participation
- Complete Training Kit
- Coffee Break
- Closing Ceremony
Gold Package
At least 3 people
USD1,850
- 5-night stay in a 5-star hotel
- Workshop or Program Participation
- Airport Transfers
- Customized Badge
- Expert Mentorship (Private Sessions)
- Supervision & Secretarial Services
- Accredited Certificate of Participation
- Complete Training Kit
- Coffee Break
- Closing Ceremony
Complete your registration
We will contact you within one business day to confirm.