Most recovery effort on smart factory projects is spent on problems that were visible early. Stakeholders withdraw support for the project and portfolio delivery discipline quietly before they withdraw it formally. Cases are chosen to expose the trade-offs in the wider project and portfolio delivery agenda rather than to illustrate ideal conditions. Post-incident reviews keep identifying weaknesses in smart factory projects that were visible long before the incident. Participants gain a clear basis for measuring what the project and portfolio delivery capability has actually achieved. It is designed for mixed groups, so that this strand of project and portfolio delivery is examined from more than one functional angle. The programme converts smart factory projects from an area of general awareness into a set of repeatable practices. Teams frequently over-invest in documenting the project and portfolio delivery capability and under-invest in testing it. It closes by agreeing the smallest change to the wider project and portfolio delivery agenda that would make a visible difference.
Expected Learning Outcomes
✓
Manage stakeholders of smart factory projects according to influence and interest.
✓
Apply a repeatable review cycle to smart factory projects and act on what it produces.
✓
Verify that improvements to smart factory projects have held six months after they were introduced.
✓
Establish quality acceptance criteria for the deliverables of smart factory projects.
✓
Control change to smart factory projects so every variation has a price and a decision.
✓
Plan resource and capacity for smart factory projects against other commitments.
✓
Review contracts and agreements for the obligations they create around smart factory projects.