Systems supporting technology governance committees fail in ways that are obvious afterwards and invisible before. Availability targets for the practice within technology and systems delivery are commercial commitments, whatever the engineering team calls them. Participants gain a clear basis for measuring what this aspect of technology and systems delivery has actually achieved. The difficulty is not agreeing that technology governance committees matters — it is deciding what to stop doing to make room for it. Participants who influence the technology and systems delivery capability without directly controlling it will find the content directly usable. Each session closes with a decision the participant must justify about the technology and systems delivery discipline in their own setting. The professional literature on technology governance committees converges on a small set of controls that reliably work. It concentrates on the parts of this aspect of technology and systems delivery that determine outcomes and treats the rest proportionately. The final session converts the week's work on this strand of technology and systems delivery into commitments with owners and dates.
Expected Learning Outcomes
✓
Assess the current state of technology governance committees against a structured set of criteria rather than impressions.
✓
Plan capacity for technology governance committees against measured growth rather than optimism.
✓
Test technology governance committees under realistic load before it meets real load.
✓
Identify the failure points in technology governance committees most likely to cause loss, and control them first.
✓
Measure delivery and reliability of technology governance committees with indicators teams trust.
✓
Set acceptance criteria for technology governance committees before work begins rather than after.
✓
Apply access control and least privilege throughout technology governance committees.
Who Should Attend
✓
Analysts producing the data on which decisions about technology governance committees rest.
✓
Software engineers and technical leads building technology governance committees.
✓
Infrastructure and platform engineers operating technology governance committees.