A schedule for project office performance metrics without a critical path is a wish list with dates. Projects involving performance metrics are rarely late all at once; they are late a day at a time. This programme builds the project and portfolio delivery capability from first principles, without padding and without omitting what matters. It is appropriate for those preparing to take on wider responsibility for project office performance metrics. The outcome is a practitioner who can hold a position on this strand of project and portfolio delivery and revise it on evidence. A common pattern is strong design of performance metrics paired with weak follow-through. Post-incident reviews keep identifying weaknesses in project office performance metrics that were visible long before the incident. Participants test their assumptions about performance metrics against scenarios designed to break weak ones. The programme ends where implementation begins, with the project and portfolio delivery capability broken into steps someone can start on Monday.
Expected Learning Outcomes
✓
Handle the trade-offs in project office performance metrics between speed, cost and assurance explicitly rather than implicitly.
✓
Establish quality acceptance criteria for the deliverables of performance metrics.
✓
Manage dependencies between project office performance metrics and other initiatives.
✓
Build a register of the risks attaching to performance metrics and keep it current.
✓
Diagnose whether a problem in project office performance metrics is one of design, resourcing or discipline.
✓
Define the scope of performance metrics precisely, including what is explicitly excluded.
✓
Manage stakeholders of project office performance metrics according to influence and interest.