Growth built on poorly controlled monetary policy and banking impact reverses faster than it accumulated. In finance the difference between a healthy position on banking impact and a dangerous one is often a single assumption. Progress on this aspect of financial and banking practice is usually lost in the gap between approval and execution. The outcome is a practitioner who can hold a position on monetary policy and banking impact and revise it on evidence. It is appropriate for those preparing to take on wider responsibility for the financial and banking practice discipline. Work is grounded in real cases drawn from banking impact, which each participant adapts to conditions in their own organisation. Content is organised around the decisions practitioners actually face in monetary policy and banking impact, not around theory headings. The professional literature on banking impact converges on a small set of controls that reliably work. The programme ends where implementation begins, with the wider financial and banking practice agenda broken into steps someone can start on Monday.
Expected Learning Outcomes
✓
Review contracts and agreements for the obligations they create around monetary policy and banking impact.
✓
Assess the concentration risk building up inside banking impact.
✓
Apply a repeatable review cycle to monetary policy and banking impact and act on what it produces.
✓
Plan the remediation route when a weakness in banking impact is identified.
✓
Build the control framework around monetary policy and banking impact that an examiner would accept.
✓
Assess the current state of banking impact against a structured set of criteria rather than impressions.
✓
Assess the capital and liquidity implications of monetary policy and banking impact.
Who Should Attend
✓
Financial technology and change staff modernising monetary policy and banking impact.
