Document the approval chain for exceptions to policy on automated regulatory reporting.
Building Automated Regulatory Reporting Systems for Supervisory Bodies
Develop the judgement and the documentation needed to run automated regulatory reporting properly.
📍 Cairo🗓️ 5 training days📚 4 modules🎓 Accredited certificate
5intensive training days
4scientific modules
8training sessions
32detailed points
Course Overview
Models supporting automated regulatory reporting fail quietly, and usually at the worst moment. In finance the difference between a healthy position on this aspect of financial and banking practice and a dangerous one is often a single assumption. Most organisations already have a policy on the financial and banking practice discipline; far fewer can show it working. The result is the confidence to make and defend decisions about automated regulatory reporting under scrutiny. The programme suits teams tackling this aspect of financial and banking practice together as readily as individuals attending alone. Organisations that document the financial and banking practice capability properly resolve disputes about it far more quickly. It establishes a shared vocabulary for automated regulatory reporting so that teams can disagree productively about it. The programme uses small-group work so that each participant's treatment of the practice within financial and banking practice is examined, not just described. The programme ends where implementation begins, with this part of financial and banking practice broken into steps someone can start on Monday.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Set early warning indicators that flag deterioration in automated regulatory reporting.
Design reconciliation and settlement controls covering automated regulatory reporting.
Build a register of the risks attaching to automated regulatory reporting and keep it current.
Select indicators that show whether automated regulatory reporting is improving, and reject those that only look useful.
Adapt recognised practice on automated regulatory reporting to local constraints without hollowing it out.
Build the control framework around automated regulatory reporting that an examiner would accept.
Who Should Attend
Consultants and advisers supporting clients on automated regulatory reporting.
Investment and portfolio managers exposed to automated regulatory reporting.
Finance managers reporting on automated regulatory reporting.
Relationship and product managers whose targets depend on automated regulatory reporting.
Credit and underwriting officers assessing automated regulatory reporting.
Managers of multi-site operations seeking consistency in automated regulatory reporting.
Course Modules
Automated regulatory reporting: capital, liquidity and balance sheet effect
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1What a supervisor will ask about automated regulatory reporting, and in what order
- Collect evidence on the present handling of automated regulatory reporting before proposing changes.
- Confirm that those complying with automated regulatory reporting understand why it exists.
- Check that automated regulatory reporting still works when volumes rise unexpectedly.
- Confirm reporting on automated regulatory reporting reaches the committee that can act on it.
Session 2The assumption inside the model for automated regulatory reporting that nobody revisits
- Define the trigger that would require automated regulatory reporting to be redesigned.
- Distinguish symptoms from causes when automated regulatory reporting underperforms.
- Name a single owner for each element of automated regulatory reporting.
- State the risk appetite for automated regulatory reporting as a number, not an adjective.
Automated regulatory reporting: reporting that supports a decision
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1Setting a limit on automated regulatory reporting that will actually be respected
- Identify the key controls over automated regulatory reporting and who tests them.
- Identify the data already collected that bears on automated regulatory reporting.
- Agree what will be standardised in automated regulatory reporting and what will not.
- Identify where judgement in automated regulatory reporting is legitimate and where it is not.
Session 2What automated regulatory reporting does to capital and liquidity under stress
- Design the exception process for automated regulatory reporting and require a documented rationale.
- Set out the decisions in automated regulatory reporting that require sign-off and by whom.
- Confirm that contractual obligations around automated regulatory reporting are understood.
- Set out how exceptions to automated regulatory reporting are requested and approved.
Automated regulatory reporting: measurement, models and their assumptions
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1What has to be agreed before work on automated regulatory reporting starts
- Define acceptance criteria for automated regulatory reporting in advance.
- Confirm client due diligence standards applied to automated regulatory reporting are current.
- Document the remediation plan for each known weakness in automated regulatory reporting.
- Review the pricing of automated regulatory reporting against the risk being assumed.
Session 2The cost of automated regulatory reporting and how to present it
- Arrange the handover of automated regulatory reporting so capability survives staff changes.
- Check the accounting treatment applied to automated regulatory reporting against current standards.
- Assess the capital consumed by automated regulatory reporting under current and stressed conditions.
- Build the internal briefing that explains automated regulatory reporting to those affected.
Automated regulatory reporting: regulatory obligation and supervisory expectation
2 sessions · 8 pointsSession 1Concentration building quietly inside automated regulatory reporting
- Check the legal and contractual exposure created by automated regulatory reporting.
- Set early warning indicators for automated regulatory reporting with defined action thresholds.
- Close out actions on automated regulatory reporting rather than leaving them open indefinitely.
- Prepare the evidence pack demonstrating automated regulatory reporting operated as designed.
Session 2Reading the current state of automated regulatory reporting honestly
- List the assumptions in any model supporting automated regulatory reporting and when each was last challenged.
- Agree who signs off automated regulatory reporting and record that they did.
- Translate the appetite for automated regulatory reporting into limits someone monitors daily.
- Test automated regulatory reporting against a scenario the organisation would rather not model.
Choose the package that suits you
Silver Package
At least 3 people
USD1,250
- Workshop or Program Participation
- Airport Transfers
- Customized Badge
- Expert Mentorship (Private Sessions)
- Supervision & Secretarial Services
- Accredited Certificate of Participation
- Complete Training Kit
- Coffee Break
- Closing Ceremony
Gold Package
At least 3 people
USD1,850
- 5-night stay in a 5-star hotel
- Workshop or Program Participation
- Airport Transfers
- Customized Badge
- Expert Mentorship (Private Sessions)
- Supervision & Secretarial Services
- Accredited Certificate of Participation
- Complete Training Kit
- Coffee Break
- Closing Ceremony
Complete your registration
We will contact you within one business day to confirm.